In the context of a dispute between a football club and its jersey partner, the matter was referred to the Court of Cassation. The question raised before it was how to compare two competing offers from two sports suppliers. The Court of Cassation ruled that the comparison of two equipment suppliers' offers cannot be made …
La comparaison de deux offres d'équipementiers ne peut pas se faire sur les seuls éléments financiers. La comparaison doit se faire au regard des différents critères. Les juges ne peuvent donc pas se fonder que sur les éléments financiers d’un contrat pour dire si une offre est mieux-disante, identique ou moins-disante qu’une autre offre.
By a decision of 11 July 2018 No. 17-10458, the Court of Cassation (french civil superior court) ruled on a dispute on the validity of a contract concluded between a football club and a sports agent which was concluded by exchanging e-mails. A sports agent company initiated proceedings against a professional football club to …
Lire la suite de Is the sports agent’s mandate concluded by e-mail exchanges null and void?
La Cour de cassation a statué sur un litige relatif aux conditions de validité d’un contrat conclu entre un club de football et un agent sportif par des échanges d’e-mails ou de courriels
French Law .Blog 