A bank that executes a wire transfer order for investment purposes acts merely as a payment service provider. As such, it is under no obligation to interfere with the appropriateness of the investment, nor to warn its client of its speculative nature. The bank can only be held liable in the presence of apparent anomalies …

Lire la suite de Wire transfer fraud: the principle of non-interference on the part of the bank justifies a strict interpretation of the concept of ‘apparent anomaly’,